Letting it be.

t e n  n i n e   d i r e c t o r s   a n d   t h e i r   m u s e s
i know, i could have chosen different ‘couples’ and i don’t even know if the word ‘muse’ is appropraite… yeah, it’s very subjective :)

Joe Wright and Keira Knightley (3 movies) | Martin Scorsese and Robert De Niro (9 movies) | David Fincher and Brad Pitt (3 movies) | Billy Wilder and Jack Lemmon (7 movies) | Quentin Tarantino and Uma Thruman (3 movies) | Akira Kurosawa and Toshiro Mifune (16 movies) | Tim Burton and Johnny Depp (8 movies) | Alfred Hitchcock and Grace Kelly (3 movies) | Francois Truffaut and Jean Pierre Leaud (7 movies) | Frank Capra and James Stewart (3 movies) | Martin Scorsese and Leonardo Dicaprio (4 movies) | Sydney Pollack and Robert Redford (7 movies)

(Source: nami64, via savethedramaforallama)

(via beathings)

(Source: briancorker, via regiondeetiopia)

My dear Sir
Art is useless because its aim is simply to create a mood. It is not meant to instruct, or to influence action in any way. It is superbly sterile, and the note of its pleasure is sterility. If the contemplation of a work of art is followed by activity of any kind, the work is either of a very second-rate order, or the spectator has failed to realise the complete artistic impression. 
A work of art is useless as a flower is useless. A flower blossoms for its own joy. We gain a moment of joy by looking at it. That is all that is to be said about our relations to flowers. Of course man may sell the flower, and so make it useful to him, but this has nothing to do with the flower. It is not part of its essence. It is accidental. It is a misuse. All this is I fear very obscure. But the subject is a long one.
Truly yours,
Oscar Wilde (x)

(Source: alecshao, via freecocaine)

GRANDE.

(via freecocaine)